| 2017-02-19 12:43:43 Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Re: Igor Eged, One more comment | # 7051 |
| Dear Alex,
just a short reply to the questions: 1) no, we didn't decide based on any furla's speculations and the usage of a term misuse is a subjective opinion 2) hard to speak for everyone, people have their own opinions, some can consider it lack of maturity, some selfishness (as some players in your team would really prefer to have the chance of playing with strong opponents further, but ok they can still join other teams), it doesn't change much whether it's a bluff or not, also bears have used the same "threat", but these are not real threats to others, you are just hurting yourselves, the competition will survive even without teams that care so much about their pride or one, in their opinion, unfair loss than about the bigger picture and chance to play with the best. I personally didn't know and gave to it like 65%-35% leaving-not leaving. And one more remark. May be you have misread, but I want to point out there is a difference between "possible lack of good will" and "proven lack of good will", where it's not easy to prove the latter. You could have chosen to stay and rather come up with some good suggestions and rule changes that would prevent situation like this happening in the future. That's for now, my statement at least to some questions. | |