| 2010-04-06 11:17:44 • Tomo Dernovšek (jezek_si) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4766 |
| Dont worry, all members are alive, but we have different opinions about this case. Decision is very important for lotting pairs from the top, specialy we have 2 rounds only till the end of EL. The case is so much problematic, because we cant know, which team tells the truth.
The 8th round has started on Monday. You can ask your teammates immidiately when they can play without knowing your opponent. Just wait for the pairs. I hope that all teams (specialy from the top) understand that committee tries to find equitably decision. | |
| 2010-04-06 09:55:57 • Pavel Laube (kedlub) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4763 |
| Read that answers properly iec, "just in case" is the explanation of "Why Zathras actually played that extra match". "The interesting position" is the responce to "Why he played the same moves" - so there seems to be no internal agreement about replaying the position between them (although in Zathras case, who knows...).
However, the committe has had already one week to solve it, the new round should start and there is still no outcome. I hope not only iec is alive there.. Salve | |
| 2010-04-06 03:02:18 • Michał Wileczek (krvilumisiek) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4762 |
| there was no word about "just in case"
it was only told that its new game, on table | |
| 2010-04-06 01:44:55 • Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4761 |
| This seems inconsistent for me.
In message 4720 you write they played the game 'just in case...' and now because the position was interesting? You mean both teams just waited for some private game to finish? Why didn't you interrupt the game then. Very important question for me is, how was the match score counted on main chat. Including the third game or without it? Because it seems KR played then with false hope they are fighting for draw etc. I was away in Hungary without internet access now, but we have to sort this out before pairing for next round is made. What about some witnesses? Any other comments about this match? | |
| 2010-03-31 08:01:25 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4744 |
| As Costinas said, Kr is at our mercy. We shouldn't need to proof anything else than say that the first 2 games were EL games. The burden of proof is at KR side. KR has already said that in their opinion the third game was played as a rematch. We deny the third game being EL game.
This shouldn't really matter at all, but I can give you an answer to the question that why was the same position repeated in "third game". Zathras considered the position interesting and wanted to go for the same line. | |
| 2010-03-30 20:35:36 • Costinas Beniamin (vlh_dragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4742 |
| I understand your attempt to get a draw out of it , but as i see things , Mollo won . Even if he did say so , that means 0 if they want to deny it (and who can blame them). Practically, you are at their mercy , yet you make it seem as if they are breaking the rules (which is cute ... but it's WROOONG !!! ... as in that tv cartoon , 2 stupid dogs :D ). | |
| 2010-03-30 19:40:40 • Mateusz Miśkiewicz (krmorph) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4741 |
| This is does't matter now, Monika :) | |
| 2010-03-29 22:14:26 • Monika Kolouchová (olsava) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4734 |
| Sorry Vilumisiek for this, but I should remind to you our match, when this sites was down. On Wednesday we both agreed to play on Saturday. On Saturday when my team was ready to play, you cancelled it and I couldn´t do anything, because the date wasn´t write here. It´s funny for me to see you talking about the agreement... | |
| 2010-03-29 20:44:38 • Riku Kuokka (tornitus) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4732 |
| Zathras agreed to play it just in case there is some rule that he isnt aware of. | |
| 2010-03-29 19:11:13 • Michał Wileczek (krvilumisiek) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4731 |
| both players agree play 3 game with result like second game | |
| 2010-03-29 19:03:03 • Mateusz Miśkiewicz (krmorph) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4730 |
| Be happy from draw like us. That was really fair game and should be example to another teams !! :) | |
| 2010-03-29 17:55:10 • Riku Kuokka (tornitus) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4729 |
| I'm interested in hearing why should we be happy with a draw? Really weird in my opinion.
May i read between the lines that you are meaning "you should be happy with this draw, because our team is so much better anyway."? I really disagree, we should not be happy with a draw, because we won the game 17-15.. -tornitus | |
| 2010-03-29 17:49:22 • Mateusz Miśkiewicz (krmorph) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4728 |
| Sorry Guys, we repeate game because, in first game i had problem with comp and i lost, then i lost for miss click, so apsolutlly was 0-2. But in this day I had unluck with copm. Then i ask Zathras "Can we repeate first game?" Then we repeate. You Team Mollo should be happy this draw. Thats all from my side | |
| 2010-03-29 13:34:22 • Riku Kuokka (tornitus) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4727 |
| The third game was played _just in case_ because players werent sure what the rules say. And as you can see, they say "5.7.A player gains 1 game point for each won game." So this should be a clear case.
There is no fairplay-rule that forces player to give his opponent a new chance. Zathras wasnt sure about this, and asked if he must play. No one gave him the answer so he decided to play this 3rd game just in case. I think rules are rules, and 2 games matter, the third game was non-EL-game. kind regards, tornitus | |
| 2010-03-29 12:17:11 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4725 |
| So what is the rule that should have been understood here? I don't see a rule saying that if two players play third game, it is automatically considered as a rematch of one of the previous games. Such declaration would be a disaster full of contradictions on internet based tournaments in general, because there could be reasons like accidents, continuing playing just for fun, unclear rematches done by not knowing or understanding rules, non-understandable rules,..
I think it is very natural to not be 100% sure if this rule covers disconnection being a loss: 5.7.A player gains 1 game point for each won game. Actually I think draw would be better for our team because with a win we will be paired with an opponent we have no chance to beat on next round :). But I hope this issue here brings also some clarity if the rules are revised one day. | |
| 2010-03-29 11:48:45 • Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4723 |
| Well, if he had 5:xx then it was also a disadvantage for the opponent to replay the same position. If the position would be his advantage, then those 4+ extra minutes can be well used for attack. But with accepting an agreement, and accepting exactly the same moves to be played, the player is accepting this disadvantage voluntarily. 5 minutes break between games can be also misused for analysis. For future the best would be either to not replay at all or to replay using a completely new game, but both captains should agree about this first in advance, which seems was not a case here.
To replay "because I don't know the rule" is strange, because every team confirmed the members read and understand the rules :) OK, now waiting for response from KR but please no insultations or bad behaviour, just facts. | |
| 2010-03-29 11:12:53 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4722 |
| Wait a second. I think it's the KR who should say why the third game should be counted and not us saying why it is not. IMHO it should be always like that in case there is no common understanding how third game affects the score. So let's see their story first. | |
| 2010-03-29 10:58:35 • Igor Eged (ancientdragon) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4721 |
| My question is: was the third game really played "just in case" or both players made a gentleman agreement that because the first game was interrupted by network problem they don't count it and replay it again. I wonder, why would krmorph want to replay the first game otherwise? | |
| 2010-03-29 10:36:10 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4720 |
| Third game was played, because zathras wasn't sure about the rules and he wanted to play it just in case, so that the issue could be sorted out later. However, he asked in game room during games against krmorph if he can get +1 from first game.
As a side note, krmorph had 5:xx left on clock when disconnection happened. | |
| 2010-03-29 10:06:18 • Tomo Dernovšek (jezek_si) | |
RE: Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo | # 4717 |
| Committe asks both captains to explain why Zathras and Krmorph played the 3rd game and the reasons why the 3rd game is (not) valid. | |
| 2010-03-28 22:02:38 • Michał Wileczek (krvilumisiek) | |
(up to 40 characters, HTML tags are not | # 4713 |
| haha, be seriuos
im sure that comitet will see it and tell who have right losers | |
| 2010-03-28 17:29:04 • Marko Pellikka (pellikka) | |
Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo 15:17 | # 4711 |
| Klub Rzeszow - Team Mollo 15 : 17
Round: 1 krcrosslet - fire2fire 1 : 1 krmorph - tornitus 1 : 1 krvilumisiek - zathras 1 : 1 krjabik - pellikka 1 : 1 Round: 2 krmorph - fire2fire 1 : 1 krjabik - tornitus 0 : 2 krcrosslet - zathras 2 : 0 krvilumisiek - pellikka 0 : 2 Round: 3 krjabik - fire2fire 2 : 0 krvilumisiek - tornitus 1 : 1 krmorph - zathras 0 : 2 krcrosslet - pellikka 1 : 1 Round: 4 krvilumisiek - fire2fire 1 : 1 krcrosslet - tornitus 0 : 2 krjabik - zathras 2 : 0 krmorph - pellikka 1 : 1 Maybe Klub Rzeszow has a different opinion about the outcome of the krmorph - zathras games. But you can see the result played with opposite colors on PlayOK statistics section. -marko | |
| 2010-03-06 09:37:26 • Peter Jonsson (peterjo) | |
luffarna - attack team | # 4627 |
| Attack team did not show up on February 25.
Peter Jonsson, captain Luffarna | |
| 2010-01-31 17:47:05 • Ádám Varga (songokukek) | |
Kulonleges Erook- Attack team | # 4547 |
| Kulonleges Erook vs Attack team : +-
Attack team didn't appear so we won by walk over. | |
| 2010-01-24 16:25 • József Barabás (erkisherceg) | |
Easy Riders vs Attack team | # 4511 |
| Easy Riders vs Attack team : +-
Attack team didn't appear so we won by walk over. | |
| 2009-12-08 22:40:29 • Michał Żukowski (zukolepl) | |
cRUSaders 27 - 5 Attack Team | # 4329 |
| cRUSaders 27 - 5 Attack Team
crgrady - atparys 1:1 crnikolay - atsnieznyy 2:0 crspartak - atmaniac 1:1 crvostok - wssuczkins 2:0 6:2 crgrady - wssuczkins 1:1 crnikolay - atparys 2:0 crspartak - atsnieznyy 2:0 crvostok - atmaniac 2:0 7:1 ( 13:3 ) crgrady - atmaniac 2:0 crnikolay - wssuczkins 0:1 ( and +:- ) crbaumanec - atparys 2:0 crvostok - atsnieznyy 2:0 7:1 ( 20:4 ) crgrady - atsnieznyy 1:1 crnikolay - atmaniac 2:0 crbaumanec - wssuczkins +:- crvostok - atparys 2:0 7:1 ( 27:5 ) cRUSaders : crvostok 8-0 crnikolay 6-1 ( and one +:- ) crgrady 5-3 crspartak 3-1 crbaumanec 2-0 ( and two +:- ) Attack Team wssuczkins 2-3 ( and three -:+ ) atmaniac 1-7 atparys 1-7 atsnieznyy 1-7 | |
| 2009-11-17 00:45:22 • Piotr Małowiejski (dt_angst) | |
Dark Team - Czech Layback B 25:7 | # 4260 |
| Dark Team – Czech Layback B 25:7
I round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 7:1 Dtangst – Bizur 2:0 Dtdein – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtence – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtpuholek – Czltero 2:0 II round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 5:3 (12:4) Dtangst – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtdein – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtence – Czltero 0:2 Dtpuholek – Bizur 2:0 III round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 6:2 (18:6) Czlkolecko for Bizur Dtangst – Czlpruda 1:1 Dtdein – Czltero 2:0 Dtence – Czlkolecko 2:0 Dtpuholek – Czl3ck 1:1 IV round Dark Team – Czech Layback B 7:1 (25:7) Dtangst – Czltero 2:0 Dtdein – Czlkolecko 2:0 Dtence – Czl3ck 2:0 Dtpuholek – Czlpruda 1:1 Dark Team 25–7 Dtangst 7–1 Dtdein 7–1 Dtpuholek 6–2 Dtence 5–3 Czech Layback 7–25 Czlpruda 4–4 Czltero 2–6 Czl3ck 1–7 Bizur 0–4 Czlkolecko 0–4 Thank you for interesting match and good luck next rounds! Kind regards, Angst | |
| 2009-11-11 19:34:09 • Radek Cmiel (mrzx6rr) | |
RE: corrections | # 4248 |
| Yep, this one pint is my:-D | |
| 2009-11-11 16:02:48 • Pavel Laube (kedlub) | |
RE: corrections | # 4246 |
| Nonsense :-) | |
| 2009-11-11 14:21:23 • Michał Żukowski (zukolepl) | |
corrections | # 4245 |
| third round Midi Rod NG - Superteam_
2 mrzx6rr : st_matandros 0 : 1 1 : 0 1 : 1 fourth round Woodenheads B - Company 2 wh_kedlub : com_rakdar 1 : 0 0:1 1 : 1 | |